Home Blog Page 241

‘Premature’: Basic Education Department slams media reports over introduction of unisex toilets in schools

THE Department of Basic Education said on Wednesday that it has noted with disappointment media reports about plans to introduce unisex toilets in public schools.

The department said speculation in the media was based on a leaked document about consultations that are currently underway on the Guidelines for the Socio-educational Inclusion of Diverse Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, Expression and Sex Characteristics (SOGIESC) in Schools.

“The media reports are based mainly on an initial draft discussion document which has since evolved following consultation before it is published for public comment.”

“This is a matter blown out of proportion, which may have arisen from the consultations that are currently underway on the Guidelines for the Socio-educational Inclusion of Diverse Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, Expression and Sex Characteristics (SOGIESC) in Schools,” the department said in a statement.

The department said a narrow focus on “unisex toilets” is unfortunate as it misses the bigger debate on the elimination of gender discrimination in all spheres of society.

The document, although still under continued consultation, asks pertinent questions about inclusion of sexually and gender diverse children pertaining to school admission, curriculum, co-curricular programmes, uniforms, and facilities.

“It is not entirely true that the Department is proposing unisex toilets. Instead, the Department is probing about relevant response mechanisms to ensure the constitutional obligation for socio-educational inclusion of sexual minorities, and avoid the currently overwhelming litigation,” said DBE.

DBE said the bigger part of the document is an exploration of how the education system supports schools to create a safe and caring environment so that all children may experience a good living and learning experience without discrimination or prejudice.

“The petitions conducted by some political parties are premature because a formal public engagement process will take place once the current phase of consultations are concluded,” the Department said, appealing for calm as the matter is still being processed in terms of the normal protocols.

The guidelines are still undergoing district consultations as recommended by the Council of Education Ministers and will be published in 2023.

  • Inside Education

Here is what to do if you lost matric certificate or want to combine results

IF your matric certificate is lost or damaged, or if you want to combine your results, you can visit your nearest Department of Education District Office to obtain a replacement matric certificate or combine your results.

Here’s everything you need to know: 

Lost or damaged matric certificate;

If your matric certification is lost or damaged, visit your nearest District Office with the following
documents:
– The original Identity Document (ID) and a certified copy,
– An affidavit stating what happened to your certificate (i.e. stating if your certificate is lost or damaged),
– If it is damaged, bring the original certificate (this is not applicable if it is lost).

Pay the prescribed fee of R153 cash at the District Office.

You may request for the statement of results for a fee of R55 cash at the District Office while waiting for the issue of your replacement certificate.

It takes between four to six weeks for a replacement certificate to be issued (for records on the system).

Statement of results can be obtained immediately.

For records not on the system, it will take longer as records need to be retrieved from the archives and loaded onto the system.

Replacement certificate: change of status or combination of results;

If you wrote your matric in more than one examination sitting and you want to combine your results to qualify for a National Certificate, i.e. Senior Certificate (SC) or National Senior Certificate (NSC), you must apply for Replacement Certificate: change of status.

The department of education does not automatically combine your credits, unless you wrote a supplementary examination.

Visit your nearest District Office with the following documents:
– Your results from all examination sittings,
-The original Identity Document (ID) and a certified copy,
– Pay the prescribed fee of R153 cash at the District Office.

You may request for the statement of results for a fee of R55 cash at the District Office while waiting for the issue of your replacement certificate: change of status.

It takes four to six weeks for a replacement certificate: change of status. The combination statement of results is obtainable immediately.

-INSIDE EDUCATION

SIU recovers R33m NSFAS money from Northlink College  

The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) announced on Tuesday it has recovered R33 million from Northlink College in the Western Cape as part of its National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) investigations. 

“The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) has recovered R33 489 884.37 from Northlink College in the Western Cape as part of its National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) investigations. This is the first actual recovery of government money since the signing of Proclamation R88 of 2022 on Friday, 26 August 2022,” SIU Head of Stakeholder Relations and Communications, Kaizer Kganyago, said. 

 Northlink College is a technical and vocational education and training (TVET) college that receives NSFAS funding for students who need the financial aid to further their studies. 

Following the announcement of Proclamation R88 of 2022, the college informed the SIU that it received over R33 million from NSFAS that was not allocated to students between 2017 and 2021 and had invested it without authorisation.

The funds are meant to assist struggling students, and not for the college to generate profits. 

The TVET college admitted that the funds should have been returned to the NSFAS, but Northlink College has failed to do so, and instead decided to invest the funds and would return the funds on request from NSFAS. 

“The SIU is currently calculating interest earned from the investment from the commencement date, and such interest would have to be paid into the SIU Trust account,” Kganyago said. 

The SIU is in terms of Proclamation R88 of 2022 authorised by the President to investigate allegations of corruption and maladministration in the affairs of NSFAS, and to recover any financial losses suffered by the State through corruption and negligence. 

The SIU investigation focuses on maladministration at NSFAS regarding two functions of the organisation. 

The first part will look into the management of NSFAS’s finances. The second part will investigate the allocation of loans, bursaries, and any other funding payable to students in terms of the provisions of the National Student Financial Aid Scheme Act, 1999, Act No. 56 of 1999. 

Furthermore, the SIU is also investigating related unauthorised, irregular, or fruitless and wasteful expenditure incurred by the NSFAS or the State, including the causes of maladministration. The SIU is also probing any unlawful or improper conduct by employees or officials of the NSFAS or the service providers in question, their employees or any other person or entity.

The proclamation covers allegations of unlawful and improper conduct that took place between 1 April 2016 and 26 August 2022, the date of the publication of the Proclamation, or before 1 April 2016 and after the date of this Proclamation that are relevant to, connected with, incidental to the matters or involve the same persons, entities or contracts investigated. 

Kganyago said the SIU is empowered to institute civil action in the High Court or a Special Tribunal in its name, to correct any wrongdoing uncovered during both investigations caused by acts of corruption, fraud, or maladministration. 

-PHUTI MOSOMANE

Cosatu, AfriForum to make oral submissions on Basic Education Amendment Bill 

PHUTI MOSOMANE

The Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU), AfriForum, Centre for Child Law, and the SA Institute of Race Relations will be making oral submissions on the Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Bill in Parliament on Tuesday.

The Bill proposes to amend the South African Schools Act of 1996 and the Employment of Educators Act of 1998, so as to align them with developments in the education landscape and to ensure that systems of learning are put in place in a manner that gives effect to the right to basic education enshrined in section 29(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.

Among others, the Bill seeks to amend certain definitions to provide that attendance of Grade R is compulsory, and to provide for system improvements in terms of admission of learners to public schools.

It also provides for financial and public accountability frameworks for governing bodies and provincial departments.

The Bill further provides for additional regulatory powers of the Minister, and enhancing decision making and oversight powers of Heads of Departments and Members of the Executive Councils.

The hearings are hybrid and can be followed on Parliament platforms.

Other entities expected to make presentations at the Portfolio Committee on Basic Education on Tuesday include the Federation of Associations of Governing Bodies of South African Schools (FEDSAS), South African Democratic Teachers Union (SADTU), Section 27, and Cause for Justice.

Last week, Equal Education and the Equal Education Law Centre (EELC), along with other stakeholders, made oral submissions to Parliament’s Education Portfolio Committee.

The bill clarifies the powers of SGBs and provincial education departments, and says SGBs must be consulted before learners are put in school, but also that the government must ensure transformation, efficient and equitable use of limited state resources.

Generally, the Basic Education Laws Amendment Bill makes important changes to key education laws, some are steps in the right direction and some changes are extremely concerning, the Committee heard last week.

Criminalisation is overly harsh and punitive, and it is not in the best interest of children to be left without their caregivers. Equal Education and the Equal Education Law Centre recommended that the government remove all sections of BELA proposing the criminalisation of parents.

Amendments introduce criminal sanctions for caregivers and parents. According to Equal Education, this will not tackle the underlying problems and will mostly impact women, who are often primary caregivers in SA.

According to the bill, certain documents are “required” for admission into school, but there are concerns about learners without any documents who equally have a right to be in school.

In its current form, the bill will allow selling and drinking of alcohol at schools but not during school hours. Although this will be regulated, both Equal Education and other organisations are deeply concerned this will harm learners and that it will not be properly implemented and monitored.

“This must be removed entirely, ” Parliamentary Researcher for Equal Education Jane Borman said.

On the positive side, the amendment provides an opportunity to open up more spaces in schools in overcrowded areas, Borman said they were in support of this.

“We can safeguard mother tongue instruction & ensure the effective & equitable management of resources in the education sector. The amendment provides an opportunity to open up more spaces in schools in overcrowded areas,” Borman added.

BELA bill forces provincial education departments to review school language policies, and consider factors like the needs of the surrounding community. Equal Education believes this is a step toward ensuring language policies are not used as a proxy for racist and exclusionary practices.

It will be interesting to hear what the Institute of Race Relations, and AfriForum say on this matter.

Inside Education will update you on the development in Parliament on Tuesday. Follow us on Twitter @Inside_Edu

Matric exams off to a rocky start with several disruptions

1

THE Council for Quality Assurance in General and Further Education and Training in South Africa, Umalusi has highlighted several concerns regarding protest action in the Northwest and Mpumalanga which has disrupted matric exams.

The protests resulted in some learners either missing the National Senior Certificate examination or writing it later than initially scheduled.

Department of Basic Education (DBE) spokesperson, Elijah Mhlanga says that the biggest challenged faced during last week’s examinations was in Mpumalanga, Emalahleni where about 1127 candidates were prevented from accessing their exam centres where they were scheduled to write either Mathematics or Math Literacy Paper 2.

Mhlanga explains that candidates from six centres could not reach the exam centre and even the ones who managed to make it to the exam centre could not write because the exam officials who deliver the question papers were denied entry to the township.

“It is a problem and we have appealed to members of the public to refrain from disrupting schools because it causes unnecessary stress and anxiety among their own children,” said Mhlanga.

Another issue was raised in Gauteng, where 53 candidates could not sit for their Economics paper 1 due to alleged communication from school management, instructing learners not to appear for the exam.

The school management also allegedly misdirected the province by stating that there was a protest in the area.

Mhlanga says that the department is investigating the matter and that the district has initiated a disciplinary proceeding against the principal of Phandimfundo Secondary School.

Further questions were raised about an alleged problematic question in the Mathematics Paper 2 exam that was written last Monday, with complaints and reports coming from different parts of the country stating that the error in the paper led to the problem being unsolvable.

In a statement, Umalusi said the standard procedure for dealing with such issues will be taken during the investigation.

According to Umalusi, if the investigation proves that an error was made, depending on the magnitude of the problem, the marks allocated to the question may be excluded from the question paper’s total marks or that alternative responses may be accepted.

“No child is going to be compromised as a result of that question because there are measures in place that covers for situations like that.”

Mhlanga says that although there have been several disruptions, the department anticipated many more challenges, and it is managing the situation fairly.

Additional reporting by Staff Reporters

Clash over new laws for schools in South Africa – including language changes and the sale of alcohol

0

THE portfolio committee on basic education has this week started hearing oral submissions on planned changes for school regulations in South Africa, with presentations pushing back hard against certain provisions in the proposed laws.

The Basic Education Laws Amendment Bill (BELA) is currently being processed by parliament and is at the stage of public consultation. Several groups related to the homeschooling sector and other stakeholders have already submitted written commentary, but the next few weeks have been set aside for oral submissions.

Presenters, including the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) and various legal experts, joined a growing list of organisations opposed to large parts of the regulations this week.

Broadly, the BELA Bill proposes to amend the South African Schools Act (SASA) and the Employment of Educators Act (EEA) to align them with developments in the education landscape and to ensure that systems of learning are put in place in a manner that gives effect to the right to basic education as enshrined in the Constitution.

To accomplish this, some of the key amendments that the Bill aims to make include:

  • – Making grade R the new compulsory school starting age, as opposed to grade 1, as is currently the case.
  • – Forcing homeschooled learners to be registered for this type of schooling
  • – Criminalising parents who do not ensure their child or children are in school, with fines or jail time up to 12 months.
  • – Requiring parents and learners to supply specified documentation when applying.
  • – Holding school governing bodies more accountable for disclosures of financial interests – including those related to their spouses and family members.
  • – Prohibiting educators from conducting business with the state or being a director of public or private companies conducting business with the state.
  • – Abolishing corporal punishment and initiation/hazing practices.

The Bill also includes controversial changes, such as allowing schools to sell alcohol outside of school hours and giving government department heads more power around the language policies and curriculums a school must adopt.

These two changes came under sharp focus this week, along with many others, with oral presentations clashing with the government over the proposals.

Pushback

According to parliament’s committee recap, the following submissions were made:

The ChristianView Network told the committee that the proposals would take more powers away from parents in directing the path of their children’s education. This was a sentiment expressed by many of the written submissions last week. The group proposed that schools that are running well, should be left alone to do so.

A joint presentation from Equal Education (EE) and the Equal Education Law Centre (EELC) pushed back against the criminalisation of parents whose children do not attend school and said this should be removed in its entirety.

According to the groups, criminalisation will not tackle the underlying problems keeping children out of schools and risks leaving children without their caregivers, as the change will most likely impact single mothers and other vulnerable groups.

In general, the SAHRC welcomed most provisions of the Bill but expressed concerns over the required list of documents from learners and parents, which it said would lead to “an exclusionary approach” from schools and serve as a deterrent for parents bringing their undocumented children to school.

Several other presenters also raised this clause as troublesome.

The Commissioner for Children in the Western Cape raised concerns and made recommendations regarding parents’ role in their child’s education, allowing alcohol to be sold on the school property, the principle of non-discrimination, and the understanding of discipline at schools.

The organisation World Changers – which works predominantly with the abuse of alcohol and drugs – urged the committee to remove the clause regarding the consumption of alcohol at schools outside of school hours from the Bill entirely.

The FW de Klerk Foundation raised concerns relating to the extended powers of the Head of Department, the impact on mother tongue education as well as the impact on undocumented learners, while Die Skole Ondersteuningsentrum said Afrikaans schools and language were under attack in the country and in the Bill.

Oral submissions on the bill will continue next week (15 November).

BUSINESS TECH

Watch: More infrastructure capacity for schools: Gauteng MEC

The Gauteng department of Education MEC Matome Chiloane will be giving more capacity to schools including rolling out of mobile classrooms with additional 4 000 new educators. This is in preparation for the 2023 school calendar.

Opinion: Universities can’t solve the higher education ‘permacrisis’ alone, says Marwala

0

TSHILIDZI MARWALA

IN 2020, as the Covid pandemic gained pace, KPMG asked a few key questions. “Traditional universities are approaching a crossroads: do they transform into new kinds of entities? Optimise existing operations to enhance efficiencies and capabilities? Do nothing in the hope that if no rescue appears they will have time to decide what to do later? Or do nothing in the belief that they are invulnerable?” In the South African context, what are the implications of this juncture as we tackle education nuances that remain stark and largely unaddressed? 

The term “permacrisis”, which has been declared word of the year, is defined as an extended period of instability and insecurity.

A permacrisis accurately characterises the state of South Africa’s higher education system.

There are inherent and implicit weaknesses, such as infrastructure deficits; appropriate staffing; modern and reframed curriculums and how they are financed so that universities can improve their performance; legacies of apartheid; and a pervasive and systemic digital divide that hinders progress. The impact of this permacrisis has been profound. Statistics indicate that the attainment of a tertiary qualification in South Africa is the lowest across all Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and partner countries. 

Higher education in South Africa, with its shattered history, has not been a place of inclusion but rather a sector that is distorted in terms of mirroring the demographic characteristics of the country. As tertiary institutions, we have begun to address this through bridging courses and remedial programmes. Additionally, shifts towards a decolonised curriculum have been pivotal for our approach to education. Yet there is far more to reimagine than the current rhetoric around the future of education. The nexus between transformation and optimisation is the key.

Compounding the precarious state of higher education in South Africa are governance challenges. In 2017, the department of higher education & training found that there were serious challenges with regards to governance, administration and management of some universities that were destabilising and undermining the effective functioning of all the institutions.

According to research conducted by Sitwala Imenda, increased government control over the affairs of higher education institutions, resulting in a sense of diminished academic freedom alongside a growing gap in trust and perceptions between academic staff and administration staff, have led to this issue. There is clearly a need for vigilance and strong accountability from the governing structures of universities.

There is inadequate resourcing of the higher education sector. Despite a marked increase in numbers of students, there has not been a concomitant increase in funding. According to PwC, it is estimated that the cost of delivering university education is around R50bn annually. State contributions declined from 49% in 2000 to 40% by 2012, while the burden on students has increased from 24% to 31%.

Additionally, the National Students Financial Aid Scheme is buckling under the weight of a weak economic performance. Even as access is addressed in some instances, accommodation shortages remain a challenge. The spatial inequalities in our country have necessitated an emphasis on accommodation. Affordable and accessible student housing poses one of the most significant stumbling blocks to expanding access. 

Then, of course, there are the difficulties in eschewing traditional modes of teaching and learning. The pandemic has served as a disruptor and hastened the breadth, speed and scope of the fourth industrial revolution. A changing world necessitates industries that are adaptable. Perhaps one of the greatest challenges we face is student retention. It is estimated that more than 40% of all first-year students in South Africa do not complete their degrees.

According to a government review of the first 25 years of democracy published in 2019, in the 2010 cohort 22% of students achieved a three-year degree within three years, only 39% had completed their degrees by the fourth year, and only 56% of students completed their degree by the sixth year. While this is in part because of financial constraints, academic performance plays a big role.

Through platforms such as Blackboard, we are able to track the performance of our students and delve into the particulars of each case. For example, we can identify if a student is only working on a mobile phone and submitting assignments at night. Based on this, we can implement interventions that address these challenges. The monitoring of academic performance also indicates where we can provide more support for students through teaching assistants and tutors. This allows us to tailor the academic programme, in a sense, to the needs of the individual. However, the vast knowledge gaps that our students face have to be addressed much earlier. 

Higher education needs not only to embrace technology but also to ready students for a changing world of work. One solution that can be posited is the development and fostering of massive open online courses (MOOCs) and micro-credentials. This partly addresses some of the challenges around access to higher education and funding constraints. However, this requires a revisiting of our certification and policy environments.

Universities in Australia, for example, have experimented with offering stackable courses and micro-credentials that enable these big institutions to successfully compete with private online providers from a stronger institutional, professional and academic position. This has allowed students from all walks of life and professional backgrounds to engage in learning that supports their aspirations. There are also institutions in countries such as Brazil that enable indigenous communities to participate in higher education while sharing local knowledge and expertise with formal research communities, strengthening capacity for environmental and agricultural interventions that work.

As we combat these challenges, mental health issues have proved a stumbling block. According to a study conducted by Universities South Africa and funded by the South African Medical Research Council, 20% of students in the university system require mental health support, yet more than 70% of students with mental disorders are not getting help. Free psychological support services units have been an integral component on our campuses. At the University of Johannesburg, for instance, the Centre for Psychological Services and Career Development assists students in various ways, including a walk-in service, individual counselling sessions and a faster emergency response through a 24-hour crisis line. However, it is apparent that there are greater interventions required across the sector.

While this merely provides an overview of some of the starker challenges that the higher education sector faces, it demonstrates that universities cannot solve the myriad challenges alone. As the Public Servants Association astutely phrased it in 2016: “Fixing higher education is a daunting proposition.” Though, I would add, not an impossible task.

Professor Tshilidzi Marwala is the outgoing vice-chancellor and principal of the University of Johannesburg.  From March 1 next year, he will be a UN under-secretary-general and rector of the United Nations University. 

Owethu Ngubane proud of national netball contribution in Fast5 Netball World Series

0

THE University of Johannesburg (UJ) netball player Owethu Ngubane is fresh from participating in the Fast5 Netball World Series that took place in Christchurch Arena, New Zealand from 5 to 6 November 2022.

The South African netball team finished in second place after losing to Australia 34-20 in the final, New Zealand finished in third place. The South Africans played five matches against England, Australia, Jamaica, New Zealand and Uganda excluding the final match.

“I am excited and overwhelmed by the experience. It means a lot to me because of the responsibility I carry as a young national player – it is a dream come true,” says Ngubane.

The netballer from KwaZulu-Natal Province was previously part of the Cheetahs Netball Academy. Prior to the Fast5 Netball Series, she played for the South Africa team in the Confederation of Universities and Colleges Sports Association (CUCSA) Games in Lilongwe, Malawi, between 28 August and 03 September 2022. She is also one of the 24 players who received professional netball contracts by Netball South Africa from 1 April 2022 to December 2023.

“When I started playing netball, I was not sure about the sport. In my primary school, I was one of the taller girls, so, the school coach approached to ask that I join the play netball team. I had a bad start, but I continued to learn and worked harder to get better. I am proud of where I am now,” Ngubane explains.

She is a UJ Road Transport Management student and the senior netball team player.

SUPPLED: UJ